A reader send this posst to me:
Subject: New data on Dr Gho’s stem cell method
In 2012, you suggested the circumstances for making an exhaustive documentation on Dr. Gho’s ‘stem cell method’. The idea was to count the number or percentage of transplanted hairs that actually grew, along with investigating the donor.
Fine, but what then? Who validates it? Who can say whether such an effort is scientific or not. And what about credibility?
A sizeable study of such sort was made very recently, with photos. See it here:
There is nothing here that looks lkike science to me. This is the problem I have had with Dr. Gho’s research.